Breiviks manifest

del 2

do they really believe the symbolism of mjöllnir (thors hammer) has the potential to unite the nordic peoples against the forces we are facing? do they really believe odinistic symbolism would be more suitable compared to the uniting force of christendom’s symbolism and that of the cross? anyone with half a brain will know that only the symbolism of the cross (which is a part of all the nordic flags btw with the exception of germany) has the potential to unite us for this cause... odinism is significant for the nordic countries but it does not have the potency to unite us against such a devastating force as islam, cultural marxism/multiculturalism and capitalist globalism... however, the national socialist still claim that these 200 000 jews (in western europe with the exception of france and the uk) are in full control of all governments and are swamping europe with people of colour (muslims included) in order to destroy these three white races (nordics, alpines and mediterranean’s)... does that make me a jew? for the sake of the argument (and knowing that ns’s are obsessed with ethnicity); i’m 100% of nordic descent and a protestant christian with no ties to any jewish organisation which would cloud my judgement (Breivik er som vi for lengst har innsett hjernevasket av jødisk løgnpropaganda, og nettopp derfor innser han det ikke selv. Jeg ser at en stor andel av innvandrerne til Europa er muslimer og at samholdet og styrken islam gir dem er farlig, men Breivik er mentalt blokkert fra å se jødisk makt i Vesten. Hadde han bare villet og kunnet se den behøvde vi ikke vise ham noenting. Den protestantiske eller katolske kirke som våpen for den nordiske rase er et dødfødt forslag. Hvordan kan han tro på sånt tøv? Kjenner han da ikke deres tenkemåte? Kirken er det siste sted vi kan vente noen hjelp i nøden. Den indre årsak til det er at kirken bærer det jødiske vesen i sin tro. Vi kan ikke vente støtte i vår forsvarskamp mot Juda fra noen som står og synger Sions pris på prekestolen hver søndag! Men Breivik ser det ikke. De nyhedenske gruppene er ikke alltid bedre; noen av dem tar skarpt avstand fra all rasisme og vil ikke engang snakke om vår rases nød.)

he will have seen how marxism was translated from economic into cultural terms; discerned the themes of sexual liberation, feminism, “victims” and so on that make up today’s political correctness; and found in critical theory the origins of the endless wailing about “racism, sexism and homophobia” that “pc” pours forth... slogans: finally, all discussion can be sabotaged with the simple technique of shouting slogans: prejudice, myth, "racism/islamophobia"... the aggressive tone of orientalism is what i have called ‘intellectual terrorism,’ since it does not seek to convince by arguments or historical analysis but by spraying charges of racism, imperialism, eurocentrism” on anybody who might disagree... furthermore, this is a very effective tool in a country where racism is the cardinal sin among all, to silence any effective debate about the continuing attachment of muslim immigrants to sharia law and their intentions toward the secular systems in which they now reside... but they've heard all their lives from officially approved authorities that any concern about multiculturalism and its consequences is tantamount to racism: "there's a widespread resignation [33] to the fact that multiculturalists control the media, academy, state agencies, and so on... bat ye'or agrees with bawer's analysis "concerning the totalitarian web cohesion of 'teachers, professors, the media, politicians, government agency workers, talking heads on tv, the representatives of state-funded "independent" organisations like sos racism' to indoctrinate the politically correct... most norwegian feminists are also passionate anti-racists who will oppose any steps to limit muslim immigration as “racism and xenophobia... western nations can never mount a defence against muslim colonisation/invasion if this is always dismissed as “racism... but above all, if you believe that non-white racism exists, it is actually immoral not to deal with the problem and its victims... i am convinced that not just non-white, but especially anti-white racism is real and a very underestimated phenomena... which means that norwegians can't say too much about muslim immigrants destroying the country, because that is racism and thus illegal... the response of the authorities to rising levels of racist violence targeting the natives has been to increase crackdowns on "racism" - by the white natives... two ambulance drivers in oslo, both of them white native norwegians, were in august 2007 involved in what became a massively hyped case supposedly involving "white racism... based on weak suspicions of "racism," the mass media, leading intellectuals and politicians launched what can only be described as a witch-hunt against the two ambulance drivers... the ideology of antiracism in some cases resembles what we have seen from communists regimes... the vast majority of racism and racist violence comes from non-whites against whites, or between different groups of nonwhites... numerous natives have had their lives ruined by similar attacks, yet anti-white racism is rarely mentioned as a problem by the mainstream media... the more vicious the rapes, muggings, and stabbings targeting whites in their own country get, the more aggressive and hysterical the witch-hunt on "white racism" becomes... and this antiracism will be for the 21st century what communism was for the 20th century: a source of violence... and since racism is something murky, anti-racism and the colourful community it purportedly represents, becomes an expression of what is pure... on top of this, we pay them to colonise our countries and harass our children, while our leaders ban opposition to this as intolerance, discrimination and racism... i have tried to contribute to a new vocabulary by coining the word “caucasophobia[1]” for anti-white racism, and have suggested the term “self-termination[2]” for organised western self-loathing and the western policy of unilaterally dismantling our own culture... their story would be of a nation that had decayed and degenerated at a fantastic pace, moving in less than a half a century from the greatest countries on earth to third world nations, overrun by crime, noise, drugs and dirt (Alt dette er sant. Men jeg tror Breivik legger for stor vekt på islam. Dette er en rasekrig og religionene spiller en underordnet rolle. Den makt som driver innvandringen kommer ikke til å tillate et islamsk teokrati med sharialov i Europa; de vil naturlig nok holde på makten selv. Breiviks problem er hele tiden at han ikke vil identifisere de mektige og den drivende kraft i utviklingen. Hvor kommer marxismen, feminismen, homolobbyen, minoritets- og offerkulten, primitivismen, antirasismen, multikulturalismen, sexifiseringen og all den andre giften fra? Har europeere funnet det på selv? Har muslimene det med seg? Uten denne gift ville vi aldri hatt noen innvandring og ingen muslimer i Europa.)

marcuse understood what most of the rest of his frankfurt school colleagues did not: the way to destroy western civilisation - the objective set forth by george lukacs in 1919 - was not through abstruse theory, but through sex, drugs, and rock ‘n’ roll (Og hvilken etnisk gruppe tilhørte Marcuse, Breivik?)

this can be theft, piracy, human trafficking, slave trade of non-muslim for the purpose of benefiting financially from sexual exploitation, drug trafficking, drug dealing to non- muslims etc)... systematic rape followed by injecting them with drugs is the usual way to break them down making it easier to exploit them... in europe, today the albanian mafia is the main engine of traffic of drugs and humans, theft and falsification of passports, weapons and human organs trade, abductions, extortions and executions (Med tanke på at det finnes 1,6 milliarder (23%) muslimer i denne verden ville det være rart om ikke også de var innblandet i organisert kriminalitet. Bortføringen og utnyttelsen av russiske og ukrainske kvinner er det imidlertid andre som står bak, men dem vil nok ikke Breivik høre om. Organisert kriminalitet er særlig utbredt i den tidligere kommunistiske verden. Den albanske mafia er velkjent og knyttet til KLA i Kosovo, som ikke er muslimsk men marxistisk. Opium-produksjonen i Afghanistan skjøt fart under sovjetisk okkupasjon 1979-89 da mujahedin trengte inntekter for å bekjempe USSR. CIA skal ha hjulpet til med å eksportere den til Vesten og Sovjet. Dette hadde intet med islam å gjøre. Taliban-lederen Mullah Mohammed Omar erklærte i år 2000 dyrkingen av opium for uislamsk og bekjempet den så effektivt at produksjonen gikk ned med 91%. Under USAs og NATOs okkupasjon og et demokratisk Afghanistan har den steget kraftig igjen. )

destructive role models who propagate and glorify drug use, primarily hashish and marijuana... many of these went from light drugs to heavier drugs such as amphetamine and even heroin... i personally know that more than 20 individuals, from my “hip-hop community”, have become severe drug addicts and some of them are probably dead today... i estimate that of the 20 000 drug addicts in norway, approximately 30-40% have initially been significantly influenced by the hip hop mentality... as such, hip hop is in many aspects an institution, a way of life that is indirectly responsible for the apathy and mental conditioning that leads to youngsters experimenting with light drugs... i know of at least 10 people (not included in the above description) who have damaged their brain capacity severely as a result of excessive use of light drugs such as hashish and marijuana... i never tried drugs myself as i never wanted to break that threshold but i was among the perhaps 5-10% of the movement that refused... negative destructive lifestyles indirectly glorifies excessive casual sex, infidelity, life threatening activities/high risk sports, suicidal and apathetic behaviour, drug use, unhealthy foods leading to obesity, the hiphop mentality (violent, racist, sexist, anarchistic) etc... this, almost anarchist behavior, often leads to “excessive whoring around” and results in a large range of negative effects for the individual and for society; venereal deceases, sterility, astronomic costs to society, drug abuse, high suicide rates (Ja! )

why bother with honouring fallen martyrs and living heroes of our struggle? it is essential and extremely important to honour living heroes of our struggle and to ensure that fallen martyrs are commemorated... how can we expect to re-found the ancient european traditions of martyrdom if no one is honouring our living and fallen heroes? ... will you condemn the patriotic heroes of the resistance movement for contributing to save their people and country from slavery and tyranny? isn’t it the most basic human right to save your own people and culture from deliberate genocide and extermination? ... the answer to that is immediately also the answer to the question whether individuals in this country are actually free or if they have already been reduced to slaves of the multiculturalist traitor elites... (Men vi har nokså forskjellig forståelse av denne kamp.)

fjordman and every writer out there who makes their intellectual work available for distribution will be viewed as valuable contributors and they will be remembered as heroes of the conservative revolutionary movement... i salute every single brother and sister who contributes day in and day out! you are the true heroes of the conservative revolution! you inspire an increasing number of europeans to follow in our path... hadn’t it been for the brave and selfless actions of these european heroes, me and people like me would not have been inspired... we need a new generation who has been shielded from the cultural marxist/multiculturalist indoctrination campaigns and we need brothers and sisters who parent these future europeans heroes... all participants in the current phase 1 civil war will be remembered as the courageous few, the immortal pioneers, true european heroes who had the courage when no one else did, who stood up against, and still stand up against an oppressive marxist tyrant... i am one of many destroyers of cultural marxism and as such; a hero of europe, a savior of our people and of european christendom - by default (Fjordman (Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen) har visst vært Breiviks forbilde og formet hans politiske anskuelser. Fjordman er sionist og tåler ingen kritikk av Israel eller jøder. Ut i fra bilder av ham og hans far (som er kommunist) har mange spekulert i om han kan ha Ashkenazi-bakgrunn. På bakgrunn av dette blir Breiviks feiring av "sanne europeiske helter" noe hul. Den nyttige idiots feiring av indre fiender? )

catholicism is far "richer" than anything protestantism can offer, since only rome can lay claim to apostolic succession and living tradition as an infallible guide to interpreting holy writ... only the roman catholic church is rooted and grounded in this ancient apostolic tradition... if the constitution, as a relatively simple human text, needs the supreme court as its interpretive guide, then all the more does scripture need the catholic church as its interpretive guide... to quote a catholic: “the splendour of roman catholic liturgy or the “vision” of the roman catholic church is immense... people are drawn to the richness of catholic symbolism expressed in the architectural beauty of catholic churches... we protestants correctly talk about our church building as “god's house”, but our church interiors resembled auditoriums, whereas you will immediately be struck by a different ambience inside catholic churches: there is a permeating “divine presence”, the candlelight, kneeling saints, statues, and wonderful altars, even when no worship is in progress... catholics themselves often buy into the non-christian aspects of political leftism... there is no larger unified group of professing christians on the face of the earth than catholics... when the church resembles a minimalistic shopping mall, the female priest wears jeans, defends abortion and the mass scale distribution of contraceptive pills, defends the jihad against the israelis and lives a sexually active life; then what is the point? we must go back to our catholic roots (Her hører vi tempelridderen og jesuitten Breivik. Det han sier om "infallible guide" vitner om den naiveste overtro; hvordan kan en moderne mann tro slikt? Forøvrig har kirken i Rom forfalsket alt til rette for seg. Den har vært ledet av maktbrynde, viljen til å underlegge seg menneskeheten. Og hva røtter angår: Vi vet jo i dag at mye av den romersk-katolske lære og tradisjon ikke har røtter i evangeliene. Det var protestantismens utgangspunkt. Sammenligningen med forfatningen og høyesterett er faktisk nyttig: Like lite som vi trenger den katolske kirke til å tolke bibelen trenger vi et fariseer-korps av høyesterettsdommere uten folkelig hjemmel til å tolke grunnloven. I det hele tatt er det en tabbe å ha en grunnlov og lover overhodet. Den eneste lov må være at folkeviljen skal skje og at folkets fører fullbyrder den. Den liberale statsmodell har til overmål vist at systemet av skrevne lover, jus-fag, domstoler og advokater ikke medfører rettferdighet men bare et enormt byråkrati og apparat av profitører. Det er helt feil måte å organisere samfunnet på. Det vi trenger er kloke og rettferdige førere lokalt og nasjonalt, ikke en uendelig mengde svada på papir. Liberalismen har gjort narr av lovbegrepet som i gamle dager var uttrykk for folkets livsvilje men nå er nedverdiget til et fikenblad for vilkårlig maktutøvelse og profesjonelt ordkløveri, akkurat som jødene holder på i Talmud. Tilbake til den katolske kirke: Breivik er blendet av kirkenes og gudstjenestenes prakt. Javisst er de praktfulle! De rommer den ypperste germanske arkitektur, billedkunst og musikk. Men hva han overser er at dette ikke på noen måte underbygger den katolske lære men uttrykker den germanske sjel som alltid har vært Romer-kirkens argeste fiende. Kirkekunsten formidler et annet budskap enn kirken! Dens nærvær i kirken vitner bare om kirkens verdslige makt og rikdom. At modernisme og liberalisme har ødelagt den protestantiske kirke er ikke et argument for katolisismen. Før i tiden var vi fattige og våre kirkebygg deretter. Men fattigdom på gods og gull er ikke til hinder for å være from og ha en skjønn sjel, snarere er det rikdommen som er til hinder. Hva sier Jesus om kamelen og nåløyet og den rike mann?

the frankfurt school’s studies combined marxist analysis with freudian psychoanalysis to criticise the bases of western culture, including christianity, capitalism, authority, the family, patriarchy, hierarchy, morality, tradition, sexual restraint, loyalty, patriotism, nationalism, heredity, ethnocentrism, convention and conservatism... the book was premised on one basic idea, that the presence in a society of christianity, capitalism, and the patriarchal-authoritarian family created a character prone to racial and religious prejudice and german fascism... fromm asserted that early capitalism created a social order that resulted in calvin’s theory of predestination, which reflected the principle of the basic inequality of men which was revived in nazi ideology... this erotic liberation was to take the form of the “great refusal,” a total rejection of the capitalist monster and its entire works, including technological reason and ritualauthoritarian language... this authoritarian character was a product of capitalism, christianity, conservatism, the patriarchal family and sexual repression... it so happened that most western europeans and americans were products of capitalism, christianity, conservatism, the patriarchal family, and sexual repression in their youth (Men hva frankfurter-skolen mener med alle sine samfunnsbegreper er hva som finnes av germansk karakter og sed i dem. Deres kapitalisme-kritikk er selvsagt ikke et angrep på jødisk handelsånd. Deres hat mot det autoritære er ikke et angrep på deres egen autoritet eller Marx' eller Freuds eller jødiske finansmagnaters eller bolsjevikføreres. Det er bare germansk autoritet de hater. Det er det germanske samfunn disse jødene undergraver. )

this "high-trust society" was a necessary precondition not only for the success of a capitalist economy in europe, but also for the rise of democracy... the welfare state wasn’t all bad, but the welfare state economies cannot compete in a world of billions of capitalists in low-cost countries... the western european cultural marxist/multiculturalist intellectual elite - who are they? cultural marxists, suicidal humanists or capitalist globalists are all multiculturalists... sociology is fundamentally anti capitalist and anti traditionalist (anti-nationalist, -patriarchal, - christendom) and as such; anti-european by design... their academic weapons are to deliberate spread their falsified and corrupted marxist world view through statistics, reports and articles with the aim to glorify the marxist/multiculturalist world view and to effectively undermine nationalistic/conservative/capitalist thought (Breivik misforstår. Germansk sedelighet gjorde at vi kunne tåle nærmest enhver samfunnsorden. Vi misbrukte i liten grad makt og muligheter til å gjøre urett. Det avlet tillit, ja, men hadde intet med kapitalisme eller demokrati å gjøre. Disse skadelige systemene snyltet på vår rettskaffenhet til å virke bedre enn de er. Jo, velferdsstater kan konkurrere med kapitalistiske slavestater; det er ikke billig arbeidskraft som skaper verdier men teknisk kløkt og oppfinnsomhet, dyktighet og ansvar, arbeidsmoral og trivsel i hverdagen. Men vi har også vært kapitalistiske og våre kapitalister avhendet alle våre tekniske oppfinnelser til den tredje verden (særlig Kina) for ingenting av griskhet. Det er riktig at "samfunnsvitenskapene" ble oppfunnet for å gi den herskende ideologi vitenskapelig autoritet og skjerme den fra kritikk. "Vitenskapelige rapporter" med krystallklare konklusjoner legger veldig sterke føringer på den politiske debatt. Det er slik rase er blitt tabu og forbudt som politisk tema, ja selv som vitenskapelig forskningsområde. )

if all ethnical groups and all cultures are equal, why is it black africans, afro-caribbean blacks, pakistanis, indians, chinese, and eastern europeans want to abandon their own lands en masse to live in the lands of the west? i mean if we're all truly equal, why does the rest of the world want to live the western lifestyle, a lifestyle created in the main by white people? just why exactly, do they want to be part of capitalism, run businesses, work for the white man's industries, claim the white man's welfare and buy and use goods created by the creativity and ingenuity of western - white - people? why flock to another land, abandoning your own people for what the white man has created? it can't be because other races are unable to build strong, advanced societies because we're all equal aren't we? so therefore it must be to enjoy the lifestyle and the culture that the white man has created which is logically to admit human races and their cultures are most definitely not equal (Dette må være noe av det beste han skrev og treffer midt i blink. Men skrev han det selv eller hvor har han det fra? )

so why do we, the capitalist countries, who do not believe in offering anyone a free lunch, subsidise the most lazy yet aggressive bunch of people on god's planet, who are bent on subverting our democratic system? the nub is, how has it come about, that the natural progression of the most advanced civilisation on earth is towards stupidity?"... this is nothing less than a genocide aided and abetted by our own elites, primarily marxist, suicidal humanist and capitalist globalist politicians and journalists... the brutal truth of the matter is the following; a welfare state will work perfectly well intertwined with capitalistic doctrines as long as the country is monocultural/the social cohesion level is at an acceptable level... globalist capitalists (like the republican party) are supporting mass muslim immigration for the cheap labour while the democratic party (cultural marxists) are supporting it for the votes (Breivik er blind for at det er en annen etnisk gruppe med andre interesser som styrer politikken i Vesten. Den fordummer oss og fremmer demokrati for at massene av dumskaller skal overdøve de kloke, men politikken de således får støtte til er klok for deres parasitære etnos. Det er ikke sant at kapitalismen er harmløs i et etnisk homogent samfunn: Den forfremmer likevel de egoistiske og grådige til maktstilling og rikdom. Det er ikke bare muslimsk innvandring de støtter men all rasefremmed innvandring. Jeg tror ikke de ser så nøye på religionen innvandrerne bekjenner seg til, men gjør de det så slår nok islam negativt ut. )

in more recent times, the patriarchal family has also proved vulnerable to the rise of capitalism, which profits from the diversion of female labour from the house to the workplace... we are a conservative organisation propagating cultural isolationism, similar to south korea and japan unlike the nsdap which was a left wing organisation, they hated christendom, capitalism and propagated a strict definition of socialism... although globalist capitalism is a destructive concept does not mean that localised capitalism mechanics are... pure laissez-faire capitalism is a globalist concept (no government intervention) and has several drawbacks... capitalistic principles within the new economic zone should still be the preferred economical model (local/national entrepreneurship with sufficient enough financial/tax incentives to ensure a thriving and healthy economy)... ensuring state control is the only way to avoid that globalist capitalist political lobby groups continue to negatively influence european policies relation to immigration and multiculturalism... i never thought i would actually argue against capitalism but the us model is an extreme variant, almost resembling a pure laissez faire model... while capitalistic principles should be protected, it should be somewhat regulated so that it benefits other members of the tribe (scandinavian light model)... i consider myself to be a supporter of the capitalistic system, although not globalist capitalism (where international corporations dictate much of the doctrines)... i oppose globalist capitalism as globalist firms have too much political influence but i support entrepreneurship/capitalistic principles on a local, regional and national level... i was quite bombastic about the issue when i was younger, very pro laissez-fair capitalism, but not anymore... there are so many flaws with the capitalistic system and it has to be regulated to a certain degree (Hans problem er at han, som han selv bekjenner, tidligere var en laissez-faire libertarianer. Han har ikke greid å løsrive seg fra den fortiden, men motviljen mot muslimsk innvandring og multikultur som denne kapitalisme fører med seg har fått ham til å besinne seg noe. Han tror fremdeles at laissez-faire gavner innenfor visse rammer. Han ser ikke at en begrenset kapitalisme er en krigstilstand som må føre til kapitalismens avskaffelse eller begrensningenes avskaffelse. Han har ikke sett nærmere på kapitalismens vesen og hvem som profiterer på den. Han har svelget propagandaen om initiativ, incentiv, entrepenør-ånd, konkurranse og alt det der. Han har aldri studert en alternativ samfunnsorden av samhold og samarbeid. )

this is why they continue to promote mass immigration as if nothing has happened even if people get blown up, raped, mugged and murdered in their own cities... the massive wave of violence and especially rapes in western cities now is a form of warfare against whites, and it’s about time it is recognised as such... are not the notorious ‘gang rapes’ another example of collective violence to european women, just as russian soldiers did when they seized german women in a devastated berlin in 1945... tellingly, when black gang members stab each other or gang rape a white teenage girl or when muslim jihadists blow up buses and trains filled with innocent people the first concern of the guardians of multiculturalism will be to minimise the racial aspect of these events... britons whose teenage daughters are being sexually abused and gang raped by various races who hate whites... rape cases involving children under the age of 15 are six times as common today as they were a generation ago... resident aliens from algeria, libya, morocco and tunisia dominate the group of rape suspects... swedish politicians want to continue muslim immigration because it boosts the economy, yet the evidence so far indicates that it mainly boosts the number of gang rapes... the incidence of rapes carried out by muslim men in norway against non-muslim women is many times higher than rapes by non-muslim men... where non-muslim individuals (youth are especially vulnerable) cannot move freely without immediate danger of getting assaulted, robbed, raped, beaten, harassed (physically or psychologically) by muslim gangs or individuals... where non-muslims cannot express individuality in all free forms (including religious, sexual, cultural) without immediate danger of getting assaulted, robbed, raped, beaten, harassed (physically or psychologically) by muslim gangs or individuals... where drunk, lightly dressed, non-muslim girls/women cannot move freely after dark without immediate danger of getting assaulted, robbed, raped, beaten, harassed (physically or psychologically) by muslim gangs or individuals... we have had several recent cases where native girls have been gang raped by immigrants in the heart of the eu capital, yet when the natives wanted to protest against the islamisation of their continent on september 11th 2007, the demonstration was banned by the socialist mayor of brussels, whose ruling party is heavily infiltrated by muslims... norwegian newspaper dagbladet reported in 2001 that 65 percent of rapes in oslo[9] were performed by "non-western" immigrants - a category that, in norway, consists mostly of muslims... the article quoted a professor of social anthropology at the university of oslo, unni wikan, as saying that "norwegian women must take their share of responsibility[10] for these rapes" because muslim men found their manner of dress provocative... in oslo, young girls are raped; schoolchildren are threatened with death, robbed and assaulted... the more vicious the rapes, muggings, and stabbings targeting whites in their own country get, the more aggressive and hysterical the witch-hunt on "white racism" becomes... at a time when native swedes are raped, stabbed, killed and chased out[35] of their homes by muslim gangs, the social democrats agree to continue allowing muslims to colonise the country in exchange for their votes... it’s absurd that muslim men who rape and murder christian girls are given political asylum in christian countries like ireland, spain and italy... we are sick and tired of feeling like strangers in our own lands, of being mugged, raped, stabbed, harassed and even killed by violent gangs of muslim thugs, yet being accused of "racism and xenophobia" by our media and intimidated by our own authorities to accept even more such immigration (Alt dette er viktig og riktig. Men som alltid bruker han islam som forklaring uten å begrunne dette. Han sier selv at de fleste ikke-vestlige innvandrere i Norge er muslimer, dvs. kommer fra muslimske land, og da er det jo ikke rart at de topper voldtektsstatistikken. Jeg tror ikke alle grupper av muslimer voldtar like mye: Bosniske muslimer neppe like mye som somaliere. Jeg tror rase forklarer voldtektsmønsteret bedre enn religion. En muslimsk syrier av europeisk rase er neppe en større fare for norske kvinner enn en italiener eller spanjol. Det ville være veldig interessant å se en seriøs vitenskapelig studie på dette felt. Men rase som forklaring av noenting er jo tabu så det vil vi ikke få se. I stedet vil innvandringsmotstandere fortsette å hudflette islam i blinde som den eneste politisk korrekte forklaringsfaktor. )

the truth is that israelis defend themselves so that their daughters do not have to suffer rape at the hands of muslim jihadists, the way the authorities in western european countries, and in sweden in particular, allow to happen every single day (Her setter han alle ting på hodet som vanlig. Det finnes en stat Israel alene fordi sionistene røvet landet fra palestinerne under bruk av terror, massakre og fordrivelse. Dette er bakgrunnen for intifada og jihad (hellig krig). Selvsagt er okkupantene truet av de fordrevne, er det rart? Men de har få midler til å hevde sin rett. Det aller meste av volden den dag i dag i Palestina er fremdeles av israelere mot palestinere. De har et veldig militært overtak. De lar ingen av sine bli antastet uten massiv hevn. Men hvorfor forsvarer Breivik israelerne? Forsvarer de oss? Finnes det en jøde som vil ha slutt på innvandringen av ikke-europeere til Europa? Og de som befinner seg her sendt hjem? Breivik lukker øynene for at fremmedinvasjonen av Europa skjedde fordi jødene ville den. De har brukt all sin makt i forretnings- og finanslivet, media- og underholdnings- og kulturlivet, skole og akademia, pressgrupper og politiske partier og regjering, til å fremme den. Det er de som har innført tankeforbudene og stemplet alle motstandere som djevler. Alle politikere og andre personer med høye stillinger i stat og samfunn må danse etter deres pipe eller bli utsatt for deres vrede og kjeppjaget fra sin post. Breivik lever i en permanent selvmotsigelse. Han beklager høylydt jødenes krig mot den nordiske rase - bare for i neste øyeblikk å støtte dem fullt ut. Denne dobbelttenkning er mulig fordi han aldri tillater seg å identifisere jødene som jøder når de gjør oss ondt, da opptrer de under andre etiketter: frankfurt-skole, kulturmarxister, globalister, multikulturalister. Jøder er de bare når de opptrer i rollen som ofre. Han tror på holocaust.)

sweden is witnessing the greatest explosion of street violence in its history, and a woman is raped every two hours... as a result of these actions, more than 15 000 europeans have been murdered, more than 500 000 european women have been raped and more than 5 million europeans have been robbed, ravaged and physically or mentally abused since they opened the european gates in 1955- 1970... we are fighting to end the murder, rape and humiliation of the european peoples... they have indirectly killed more than 15 000 europeans, raped more than 500 000 european women, robbed and terrorised more than 4,5 million europeans, fired more than 37 000 cultural conservatives from their jobs and incarcerated more than 150 000 brothers and sisters for opposing their policies... the same people will also say that now when the apartheid policies have been abolished it has developed an atmosphere where it is literally a free for all murder and rape fest... if you want to join this rape and kill fest, you better hurry up; because soon, there won’t be any europeans left to rape and kill... in fact, if they (the cultural marxists) against all odds renounced multiculturalism today, halted all muslim immigration and started deportation of all muslims i would forgive them for their past crimes, and i think most europeans would as well, despite the fact that more than 15 000 europeans have died and 500 000 have been raped and/or ravaged physically or mentally due to multiculturalism... i know that there are hundreds, even thousands of incidents per year (i have personally witnessed around 50 incidents) where ethnic norwegian youths ranging 14-18 are harassed, beaten, raped and robbed and it’s getting worse every year... i know at least 2 girls that have been raped my muslims and i am familiar with two more cases in my broader network (1 gang rape) (Kjemper Breivik for å få slutt på dette? Desverre er det det han ikke gjør. Han prioriterer Israel og å bygge det nye Jerusalem, bekjempe islam. Han kan aldri velge den folkelige vei og stå opp for de nordiske folk. Da han begikk sin terrorhandling angrep han ikke dem som driver dette folkemord men Israels fiender.)

perhaps one of the reasons why this has been allowed to happen in western europe and the european union is because we never fully understood or attempted to confront the reasons for the abysmal failure of communism in eastern europe and the soviet union following the cold war... the term "racist" is similar to being called a "class traitor" under communism... and this antiracism will be for the 21st century what communism was for the 20th century: a source of violence... norwegian newspaper dagens næringsliv has earlier[16]exposed the fact that the largest "anti-racist" organisation in the country, sos rasisme (the largest of its kind in northern europe with 40 000 members), was heavily infiltrated by communists in the late 1980s and early 90s, in other words, during the downfall of communism in eastern europe... they went directly from communism to multiculturalism, which indicates that some of them view multiculturalism as the continuation of communism by other means... enviro-communism is a new twisted idea of redistribution of wealth through “environmental” policies and the copenhagen climate change conference 2009 is the perfect manifestation of it... environmental justice is the new social justice; climate debt is the new redistribution of wealth, anthropogenic global warming scam is the communism... is there a connection between the fall of the ussr and the rise of the eussr, as former soviet dissident vladimir bukovksy[1] has indicated? have we entered the cold war, part 2? i notice how many former marxists now passionately support multiculturalism and mass immigration, and listened to one prominent communist “intellectual” in my country attack free speech as a concept a few days ago... it doesn’t follow that all forms of communism are inherently genocidal, as some have gleefully claimed, but it was certainly an interpretation of communist theory that was doctrinaire, authoritarian, and contemptuous of pluralism that led to stalin’s purges and to mao’s re-education camps... the idea of unlimited mass migration is 21st century communism... the difference is that the downfall of communism in the east happened through a relatively bloodless “velvet revolution,” whereas the downfall of multiculturalism in the west may turn out to be anything but bloodless... one of klein’s fellow columnists at aftonbladet, the long-time communist robert aschberg, is the publisher of expo magazine... the multiculturalists have traditionally cheered the most violent totalitarian movements in other parts of the world as “freedom fighters” (islamic and communist organisations) while native europeans in denmark, germany, the uk or france who peacefully fight against becoming a persecuted minority in their own country always are labeled as racists, fascists, nazis and generally the worst scum of the earth (Alt sammen viktige tanker som andre bør utvikle videre. Men merk hvordan han lydig følger jødisk oppskrift for å skjerme jødene for anklager i forbindelse med det kommunistiske folkemord i Sovjet-Russland: Han legger all skyld på Stalin. Men folkemordet begynte straks etter revolusjonen, mange år før Stalin kom til makten, og Stalin var jo ikke alene om det siden heller. Dette er igjen et eksempel på Breiviks delte lojalitet: Han utbasunerer at han vil kjempe for Europa, men når Europas sak støter sammen med Judas velger han Juda.)

all free europeans have a right and a duty to become “justiciar knights” for the order/tribunal with the purpose of: oppose all hate-ideologies; communism (anti-individualistic), cultural marxism/multiculturalism (anti-european), islam (anti-kafr) and national socialism (anti- jewish) (Her ser vi hans forfeilede og ufruktbare tenkning i et nøtteskall. Å kaste alle disse vidt forskjellige politisk-historiske bevegelsene i en sekk og kalle dem hat-ideologier gir ingen innsikt. Når han ikke vil søke deres opphav og vesen forblir han dum. Og han er forsåvidt "politisk korrekt" som han tramper ned, stempler, deler ut skremmende etikett i steden for å invitere til tenkning og debatt. Hat! Du er vel ikke hatets apostel? Etter det tyvende århundres kommunistiske folkemord er hans hovedinnvending at den er anti-individualistisk! En livsfjern mann. Og han kommer aldri til å undersøke jødenes rolle i alt dette, for de er ham hellige.)

Karl [Marx] knew that all religion had to go, because he knew that christianity and judaism both instilled the rights of private ownership, and self-protection, and individualism, which were completely contrary to communism (Utsagn som dette overbeviser meg om at han ikke har skjønt noenting. Særlig når han nærmer seg noe jødisk slår han over i forstokket dumhet. Han skriver her som om jødedom og kristendom var samme sak! Vet han ikke at Marx var jøde? Han er visst en av de tullingene som tror at han ikke var det fordi han var ateist! Han vet nok ingenting om jødedommen og tror at det er en religion akkurat som kristendommen. Men vet han da ikke at jøder definerer jødedom etter avstamning, ikke tro? Vet han ikke at alle jøder er ateister? Jødedommen har ikke noe religionsbegrep, ingen tro, den har bare loven. Den er avstamning og jus og all dens streben er rettet mot jordiske mål: makt og rikdom. Det vesentlige i jødisk verdensanskuelse er skillet mellom jøde og ikke-jøde, og ikke-jøden skal behandles som kveg. Kommunismen var et utmerket redskap for jødedommen. Hvis Breivik hadde levd i Russland etter revolusjonen ville jødene ha slaktet ham. Men han hyller dem og tror på dem. Han er hjernevasket av dem.)

george orwell - nineteen eighty-four, thomas hobbes - leviathan, john stuart mill - on liberty, john locke - essay concerning human understanding, adam smith - the wealth of nations, edmund burke - reflections on the revolution in france, ayn rand - atlas shrugged, the fountainhead, william james - pragmatism, carl von clausewitz - on war, fjordman - defeating eurabia (Dette er altså Breiviks foretrukne litteratur. Det viser at han står under liberal og jødisk innflytelse. Den beryktede jødiske heksa Ayn Rand (Alicia Rosenbaum) dyrkedes i de libertarianske kretser han vanket i, med et sterkt fotfeste i Fremskrittspartiets Ungdom.)

although the pccts, knights templar is a pan-european indigenous rights movement we give all europeans, regardless of skin colour, the opportunity to become a justiciar knight as long as the individual is either a christian, christian agnostic or a christian atheist... even though the pccts, knights templar are an indigenous rights organisation we do not have any racial requirements in order for an individual to become a justiciar knight... under these circumstances, the pccts, knights templar will for the future consider working with the enemies of the eu/us hegemony such as iran (south korea is unlikely), al-qaeda, al-shabaab or the rest of the devout fractions of the islamic ummah with the intention for deployment of small nuclear, radiological, biological or chemical weapons in western european capitals and other high priority locations (Her står det svart på hvitt. Han er ikke mot masseinnvandring av rasefremmede, kun av muslimer. Han betrakter alle ikke-muslimer på europeisk jord som europeere og de kan alle bli tempelriddere på lik linje! For å fremme sine mål skal denne sionisten, frimureren og anti-islamisten samarbeide med - Iran!! Og Iran skal hjelpe ham å plassere masseødeleggelsesvåpen i vestlige hovedsteder!! Hvis dette kommer fra ham selv kan man sannelig lure på om han er tilregnelig.)

the united states didn’t allow nazi germany to buy influence at us universities... nazis killed 300,000 gypsies in the gas chambers... any criticism of muslim immigration is basically brushed off as being "just like the jews were talked about in nazi germany," a ridiculous but effective statement... this has been combined with the technique, perfected by propaganda minister joseph goebbels in nazi germany, of repeating a point until it is taken to be the truth... that nearly one quarter of british people might vote for a neo-nazi party with views inimical to democracy, human rights and common decency is truly appalling... imagine the following; the sociology students learned about what is wrong in the world from a nazi narrative, that the jew is the root of all evil. wouldn’t that have lead them to draw their own conclusions based on the self study of nazi intellectual works (that the jew had to be killed)? of course it would... we join a mass movement to escape individual responsibility, or, in the words of the ardent young nazi, to be free from freedom... it was not sheer hypocrisy when the rank-and-file nazis declared themselves not guilty of all the enormities they had committed... terms such as “racist”, “fascist”, and “nazi” automatically shut down any rational discussion of a subject (Breiviks tragedie er at noen fylte ham med søppel som dette. Og han sjekker ikke sine kilder, han mangler totalt kritisk sans. Selvfølgelig har han ikke selv studert noe "nazi intellectual work", han kan sikkert ikke lese tysk, han lider av engelsksyke. Det er forsøplede sinn som gjør at nazist-stempelet straks stopper enhver rasjonell diskusjon av et emne.)

they now display great affection for islam, another thing they have in common with the nazis... it is essential to understand this and that many people would rather commit suicide or live under slavery/harsh dhimmitude than to become a nazi or fight for the nazi cause... because today’s nazism isn’t the sum of the individual doctrines of national socialism! it has rather become a massively bloated phenomenon - a reincarnation of pure evil itself... demonising nazism has through 6 decades of indoctrination (the most unparalleled indoctrination campaign witnessed in the history of man) which has developed into an unconscious established truth... this is demonstrably false and resembles the “big lie” technique employed by the nazis... western europeans and americans have always understood the intimate and vital connection between liberal education and political liberty (NSere elsker ikke islam, vi er bare ikke besatt av hat slik Breivik er. Det er meget merkelig at han her synes å forstå at menigmanns syn på NS i dag er bestemt av en indoktrinerings-kampanje uten sidestykke. Likevel er han ikke i stand til å trekke løgnene i tvil. Mistenker han ikke rekkevidden av denne kampanje? Det jødiske etterkrigs-hegemoni har gjort alt for å fremstille NS som den rene ondskap. Dette er Breiviks "liberale oppdragelse". Det finnes dem som kommer til NS fordi de tror på det! Det er en syk verden vi lever i. Den politiske frihets første forutsetning er sannhet og indre frihet. Den som har gått seg vill i mørket og er slave under fremmed ånd når aldri frem.)

it is a despicable attitude that is reducing the west to a life-support machine for other less advanced races yet if the indigenous people of the west were to adopt this unequal attitude, they would be vilified by other races along with self-loathing liberal-multiculturalists from their own race as "racists" and "haters" (Ja!)

has liberty regressed during the past two hundred years? how was it possible that immanuel kant, who lived in a german state without liberal democracy, could criticise basic aspects of religion in the 18th century, while in the west of the 21st century there are social and legal consequences for criticising other religions and cultures? it is a mistake to assume that liberty (in the meaning of freedom of speech and conscience) derives of necessity from a democracy of universal suffrage (En sjelden innsikt her! )

but what happens today to europeans who suggest that there are differences among ethnic groups, or that the traditional social roles of men and women reflect their different natures, or that homosexuality is morally wrong? if they are public figures, they must grovel in the dirt in endless, canting apologies... cultural marxism defines all minorities, what they see as the victims; muslims, feminist women, homosexuals and some additional minority groups as virtuous and they view ethnic christian european men as evil (Det har smøget seg inn en liten unøyaktighet her, lett å overse i en stort sett riktig fremstilling av forholdene: At muslimer er en særlig begunstiget minoritet, har offerstatus og er beskyttet av politisk korrekthet må vel sies å være overdrevet. De er absolutt ikke hevet over kritikk slik jøder og homoseksuelle er. Man kan krenke Muhammed og islam så mye man vil uten reaksjoner fra vestlige myndigheter og maktmennesker, men den som våger å røre ved holocaust...! Og "kristne europeiske menn" treffer ikke så godt; det er mer germansk-nordiske menn som er skyteskiven, særlig når de er germanske i ånden og ikke kristne eller bare opptatt av det ariske og antisemittiske i kristendommen.)

political correctness has its stronghold among government employees, politicians, university professors and journalists and publishers in government broadcasting companies who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual, ethnic europeans from middle-class families... and they plan to continue to do so until ethnic europeans are no longer the majority... at first, i hesitated to include anything including the word race, white or ethnicity, mainly because i instinctively dislike writing about anything related to these words... in this regard i attempted to replace the term with more compromising expressions: the words culture, native european or ethnic group (Sant, men jeg tror de skal fortsette til vi, den nordiske rase, er utryddet. Den feige unnvikende holdning han inntar til skremselskampanjen mot alt som er viktig for oss kan umulig redde oss. Rase er tross alt ikke bare et ord men også sak. Saken blir ikke anderledes av at vi finner på nye harmløstklingende ord. Bare de dummeste går med hvis vi kaller en spade for hakke men skyr oss som pesten hvis vi kaller den for spade. Hvordan skal vi forsvare vår rase hvis vi må oppgi all argumentasjon og dokumentasjon i fortiden hvor ordet rase ble brukt? )

in the fluffy bunny la-la land of these vain zealots, the sexes are equal; all ethnic groups are equal; all sexuality is equal; all children are equal and children are equal to adults; animals are equal to humans; all cultures are equal and all religions are equal... these unequal britons who endure the horrors of multiculturalism every day also know all too well the real meaning of diversity: it is nothing less than the deliberate destruction of their way of life and the systematic breakdown of their communities by state-sponsored ethnic cleansing combined with a bloodthirsty genocide committed by hate-filled, antiwhite, racist immigrants (Ja)

we must all respect that all people have equal rights regardless of sex, ethnicity, sexual orientation or religious beliefs... if european democracies cannot manage their ethnic tensions, democracy will break down, ushering in dictatorial rule... native swedes have thus been reduced to just another ethnic group in sweden, with no more claim to the country than the kurds or the somalis who arrived there last thursday... the act says in pretty clear words[1] that in cases of suspected direct or indirect discrimination due to religion or ethnicity, norwegians are guilty until proven otherwise... according to his numbers, ethnic norwegians will become a minority in their own country before 2050 if the current trends continue (Like rettigheter for alle uansett? Her hører vi den liberale Breivik. Noe fra fortiden han ikke har overvunnet ennå. Ideen om at alle mennesker er født med like rettigheter er et sentralt liberalt dogme, men har intet med virkeligheten å gjøre. Opphavet til denne idé er troen på at alle mennesker er skapt og født like innfor Gud. De liberale går ett skritt videre og tror til og med at vi er født biologisk like som tabula rasaer i hendene på det formende samfunn. Dette tankegodset hører til 1700-tallet og er avlegs.)

furthermore, it can be smart to limit the use of words like: ethnic groups, but rather focus on islam, non-islamic, muslims, non-muslims (Er dette noe av forklaringen på hans besettelse mot islam? Er det bare et psevdonym for noe annet? Leker han med ord og driver gjøn med oss?)

it’s not a secret that ethnicity is closely linked to culture in a majority of countries worldwide... an individual using "flagged" rhetoric such as "race", race war", white people, black people, jews (in the same sentence as race f example), ethnic (in the same sentence as jews) - are triggering every imaginable mine put up for him which in turn will completely obliterate his ”reputational shield” (if he ever had one)... so even though ethnicity and race still is relevant, it is not in our best interest to talk about it (Hvilken makt er det som bevirker dette, Breivik? Den makt han aldri vil erkjenne og sette navn på.)

marcuse became one of the main gurus of the 1960s adolescent sexual rebellion; he himself coined the expression, “make love, not war... the significance of the historical roots of political correctness cannot be fully appreciated unless betty friedan’s revolution in sex roles is viewed for what it really was - a manifestation of the social revolutionary process begun by karl marx... other indicators include the correspondence of friedan’s revolution in sex roles with georg lukacs’ annihilation of old values and the creation of new ones, and with herbert marcuse’s transvaluation of values... wilhelm reich’s theory, when coupled with georg lukacs’ sex education in hungary, can be seen as the source for the american education cartel’s insistence on sex education from kindergarten onwards and its complete negation of the paternal family, external authority, and the traditional character structure... laws and lawsuits, intimidation, and demonising of white males as racists and sexists are pursued through the mass media and the universities... Rytel explained why she hates white men - they are selfish, exploitative, vain, and sex-crazed - and just to make things clear, she added, “no white men, please… i just puke on them, thank you very much (Breivik, hvilken etnisk gruppe tilhørte Marcuse, Friedan, Marx, Lukacs, Reich, Rytel? Hvilken etnisk gruppe dominerer massemedia og akademia?)

if i say: "the black african is, by and large, physically stronger than other races and in sports, blacks generally make the best boxers and the best sprinters and long distance runners, i will get nods of agreement; but if i say: "whites are generally more intelligent and creative than blacks and have, throughout human history, solved the problems presented to the human race by mother nature far more effectively than blacks have", i will be vilified as a racist... such irrational behaviour is much more than plain stupidity, it is concrete evidence of psychological illness on a grand scale and it is a mental illness only affecting the people of the white race as other races and cultures know full well the entirely natural order of inequality... one way street there is a glaring fact about multiculturalism and its "all races and cultures are equal" mantra: why is it that only the west plays the multicultural game? if all races are equal, why aren't the chinese, the japanese, the koreans, the arabs, the pakistanis, the indians, the africans all accepting masses of immigrants into their lands and allowing alien cultures and religions to be of equal importance to their own? however, they do play the multicultural game of equality but only when they leave their own lands to invade, colonise and pilfer the affluent west... conversely, why isn't there mass immigration from the west to africa, china, the middle east? come on, if all races and all cultures and all religions were truly equal then this would be blatantly obvious to the rest of the world who would be falling over themselves to welcome masses of immigrants from all over the world into their lands to enrich their people with the delights of diversity in the name of equality and multiculturalism... blacks, jews, muslims, sikhs, hindus, chinese, pakistanis, indians - all of these people and more are allowed to form their own special groups with the aim of protecting and furthering their own interests based entirely on race or creed... how obvious does it have to be for them to realise that this is hard evidence, clear proof of the folly of pursuing equality between the races? because if we were all equal wouldn't other races be upholding, promoting and living by these universally moral multicultural standards of equality and be keen to see them applied to their own racists and criminals? but as we know, facts don't matter, only the fantasy of equality for all does... it is a widespread madness that is, without doubt, leading the entire white race into the abyss (Alt sammen riktig og viktig)

we should take a break from massive immigration, also non-muslim immigration, for at least a generation, in order to absorb and assimilate the persons we already have in our countries... this immigration break should be used to demonstrate clearly that the west will no longer serve as the dumping ground for excess population growth in other countries... this will finally demonstrate how serious the situation is, and force other western nations to ban muslim immigration and pressure muslim citizens to assimilate or leave... we have to deal with this fact by slowing the immigration rates to assimilation levels, or our societies, and certainly our democratic system, will slowly break down... if you look closely, you will notice that, on average, western women are actually more supportive of multiculturalism and massive immigration than are western men (Hans mål er altså å absorbere og assimilere de fremmede! Og han ønsker bare et opphold i innvandringen inntil dette er fullført, så fortsette! Det er bare demokratiet han er bekymret for.)

the terror of islamic slavery was a permanent feature of christian history from the 7th till the 19th century, but now the church is working hard to erase this memory... in addition, the overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks around the world have been committed by muslims, including, of course, the spectacular attacks of 9/11/01 (usa), 3/11/04 (spain), and 7/7/05 (uk) (Sant og usant om hverandre. Slaveri under maurerne i Nordafrika var lenge en overhengende trusel for europeere og mange europeiske kvinner endte som sexslaver i østlige haremer. Men det er lenge siden nå. De nevnte terrorangrep var noe ganske annet enn hva Breivik forestiller seg.)

Rønnaug