Breiviks manifest

del 1

should we dismiss a form of government for its past errors then we should dismiss all forms of governments and become anarchistic, for none are without their mistakes, and none have been perfect! however, only one can claim to be a priori and deontologically correct, and that is a christian theocracy (Jesuitten Breivik taler)

destructive role models who directly or indirectly propagate anti-social and antiauthority views (anarchistic views)... destructive role models who propagate and glorify anti-authority/revolutionary/anarchistic attitudes through the graffiti movement (which is a central part of hip-hop)... negative destructive lifestyles indirectly glorifies excessive casual sex, infidelity, life threatening activities/high risk sports, suicidal and apathetic behaviour, drug use, unhealthy foods leading to obesity, the hiphop mentality (violent, racist, sexist, anarchistic) etc (I denne sin motstand mot kulturbolsjevisme, dekadense og primitivisme ligger han nasjonalsosialismen nær)

as of now, each fully motivated, well prepared and battle ready justiciar knight constitutes the same usefulness in our struggle as 1000 national anarchists (Her anbefaler han det disiplinerte medlem av en militær eller paramilitær orden; NS samtykker)

we live in a time of excessive consumerism where the acquisition of wealth and prestige is the driving force in our lives... spiritually bankrupt nations without civilizational visions are nothing more than devastated wastelands of meaningless noise and excessive consumerism, which alone, has no way of satisfying the individuals longing for something greater than the feeding of his or her ego... consider new civilisational goals - from excessive consumerism where the acquisition of wealth is the driving force in our lives to instead, focus all our resources to better ourselves and the rest of our citizens scientifically and technologically/r&d (Fordømmelse av egoisme og materialisme som hos NS, men han vil erstatte det med vitenskap og teknologi! NS vil først og fremst et sedelig, sunt og åndelig liv.)

why is eugenics and reprogenetics so extremely politically incorrect to discuss? the answer is due to the “negative eugenics programs” of nazi germany... one solution will be by introducing negative eugenics programs combined with ethnic segregation somewhat similar to some policies of the third reich... we must reject negative eugenics and instead focus on positive eugenics or so called reprogenetics... according to silver, the main differences between reprogenetics and eugenics, the "science" of improving the gene pool which in the first half of the 20th century became infamous for the brutal policies it inspired, is that most eugenics programs were compulsory programs imposed upon citizens by governments trying to enact an ultimate goal... the other contrast is that it is now known that the concept of genetic purity through eugenics is misguided: this form of genetic purity, insofar as it is meaningful, is effectively inbreeding and results in poor health and infertility while the end result of reprogenetics on the gene pool would be reduced incidence of genetic disease and potentially increased genetic IQ... the nazis destroyed the reputation of “eugenics” by combining it to scientific racism and mass extermination (Med negativ eugenikk (arvesunnhetspleie) mener han vel det tredje rikes forsøk på å hemme den dårlige arvs formering, hovedsakelig alvorlig arvesykes. Mange andre land gjorde likedan. Norge fikk en lov i 1934 som tillot sterilisering av sinnssyke og personer med alvorlige kroppslige misdannelser, og tvang var tillatt. Tyskland utmerket seg ikke på dette område. Derimot var det banebrytende innen positiv eugenikk i sine bestrebelser på å fremme den sunne arvs formering. Breivik bygger sine betraktninger på jødisk propaganda og ikke kjensgjerninger. Vitenskapelig rasisme hadde intet med masseutryddelse å gjøre og ingen ble utryddet i det tredje rike. Det er også tøv at å holde blodet rent, altså å forplante seg innenfor rasen, skulle gi dårlig helse og ufruktbarhet: Rasen er blitt til fordi forplantningen har vært slik begrenset! Det overrasker ikke at han kommer trekkende med jødisk IQ-ideologi hvor ikke rase men bare jødenes IQ-tester teller.)

according to the ns movement the freemasons are a zionist organisation... the freemasons is not in any way political (i wish the organisation was, believe me) and it is true that they have a positive view on jews... the freemasons is a christian only organisation and no muslim or jew could become a member even if they wanted to... after 5 years in the freemasons i was finally accepted for rank 4-5 (it’s a combined rank) (Han nådde i alle fall 3. graden, mestergraden. NS-bevegelsen hevder selvfølgelig ikke at frimureriet er en sionistisk org: Frimureriet går i alle fall tilbake til år 1717, mens sionismen ble dannet mot slutten av 1800-tallet. Vet Breivik ingenting om den org han er medlem av? Eller oppfyller han sin skyldighet til å føre oss "profane" bak lyset? Frimureriet er i høyeste grad politisk, men det er ikke et vanlig politisk parti. Det virker for å trellbinde mennesker med innflytelse i samfunnet og utnytte dem som redskaper i sin politiske streben. At lavgradsmurerne ikke kjenner dets mål gjør det ikke upolitisk. Frimureriet har medlemmer av alle religioner og raser og er ikke en kristen org.)

there are also some libertarian right-wingers and big business supporters who see man only as the sum of his economic functions, as cheap labour and consumers, homo economicus... as has happened many times before in history, it is a transformation that occurs as secular and libertarian elements in society fail to reproduce, and as people adhering to more traditional, patriarchal values inherit society by default... i became increasingly interested in the libertarian school of thought (extreme liberalism and laissez faire capitalism) due to, my then capitalistic/self serving mindset... hat libertarianism was not a sustainable political concept... humans are more than material beings! a christian state would be more balanced in its approach to the material and spiritual needs of its citizens; contrary to the extreme materialism fashioned by liberal modernity (Den "libertarianske" (ekstremliberalistiske) fløyen i Fremskrittspartiet, som Breivik tilhørte, er sterk og der dyrkes homo economicus med guruer som Ayn Rand (Alicia Rosenbaum), Ludwig von Mises, Milton Friedman, Adam Smith osv, nesten alle jøder eller jødinner. Breivik synes å ha brutt med denne retningen. Han anbefaler et kristent teokrati med tradisjonelle og patriarkalske verdier og ser seg i rollen som tempelridder eller jesuitt. Er det derfor frimureriets despotiske hierarki tiltalte ham?)

they are the quislings who are trying to transfer political powers from our sovereign nations to a foreign political entity - the eussr/un (Å den politisk korrekte jøssing Breivik med sine "quislinger")

familial imperialism is ideologically reproduced in national imperialism… the authoritarian family…is a factory where reactionary ideology and reactionary structures are produced (Høres ut som et sitat fra Frankfurt-skolen)

the four stages of the liquidation- deportation, enslavement, forced conversion, and massacre- reproduced the historic conditions of the jihad carried out in the dar-al-harb from the seventh century on... this clearly demonstrates that for muslims this was a jihad against disobedient dhimmis, and thus a continuation of the turkish and kurdish genocide against armenians a few years earlier which was one of the inspirations for the holocaust... this genocide by the turks allegedly inspired adolf hitler in his holocaust against the jews later: "who, after all, speaks today of the annihilation of the armenians?" as efraim karsh[7] notes, "the ottomans embarked on an orgy of bloodletting in response to the nationalist aspirations of their european subjects (Et eksempel på at Breivik ikke har peiling og blander sant og usant uten å vite hvor det ene slutter og det andre begynner. Han blander mange kort på en forkvaklet måte: Arabisk imperialisme under islam i gammel tid, folkemordet på armenerne under første verdenskrig ved ungtyrkerne etter det osmanske rikes og sultanatets fall, holocaust-løgnen)

by comparison, nearly 20 percent of women born in the late 1950s are reaching the end of their reproductive lives without having had children... yet, once a society grows cosmopolitan, fast-paced, and filled with new ideas, new peoples, and new luxuries, this sense of honour and connection to one's ancestors begins to fade, and with it, any sense of the necessity of reproduction... they must encourage and even directly sponsor repro-genetics programs on a private and/or state level, which facilitates reproduction clinics who focus strictly on indigenous genotypes from pure sources (non-diluted (95-99% pure) nordic genotypes) found in northern sweden and other areas where this is available... implementing sustainable reproduction policies will not be possible until we seize political and military power in phase 2 (2030-2070) or phase 3 (2070-2090)... however, the above “reproduction industry” will ensure that the country has a sustainable fertility rate of 2,1 which can be adjusted should the women of that country decide to be a little more like madonna or the women in “sex and the city”... the usage of large scale surrogacy facilities as a secondary reproduction option for countries to compensate for non-sustainable fertility rates... reprogenetics is a term referring to the merging of reproductive and genetic technologies expected to happen in the near future as techniques like germinal choice technology (Her sier man mye riktig og bra, men han motsier det han tidligere fremholdt om renblodighet hvor han forkastet dette som skadelig. Å velge avkommets gener er forsåvidt mulig som man kan studere det befruktede eggs gener og abortere fostre med gener som koder for kjente sykdommer, svakheter og misdannelser. Sammenhengen mellom genene og det voksne individs arvelige egenskaper er imidlertid ennå lite kjent og det er mye science fiction ute og går her. Hvis det en gang i fremtiden skulle bli mulig å fremstille designer-barn hvor man har valgt hvert eneste gen fritt i steden for å føre sin egen arv videre, er jeg redd menneskers dårskap vil kverke naturens visdom og gjøre slutt på oss.)

the horrors of the jewish holocaust are taught not only in schools in israel, europe and usa, but also in germany; because both germany and israel consider the jewish holocaust a 'dark chapter' in the history... holding a higher moral standard isn’t going to defeat an iranian president with nukes, threatening another holocaust... dieter wisliceny was the deputy of adolf eichmann, the organiser of the holocaust and reportedly the inventor of the phrase the “final solution to the jewish question (Breivik er i mangt og meget politisk korrekt og ligger under for de vanlige vrangforestillingene.)

this again is directly linked to the severity of the german cultural marxist indoctrination campaigns (the american military presence and the paralyzing jewish holocaust religion is a part of this picture)... cham muslims alongside the wehrmacht (ns germany) also played a key role in the holocaust in greece, rounding up 2000 greek jews and sending them to auschwitz and birkenau... assuming of course that you are referring to the jewish holocaust under nazi germany; no, i have reviewed the evidence, both the evidence presented by the allied powers and the anti-holocaust evidence presented by the axis powers and neo-nazi movements... i don’t find the anti-holocaust evidence credible so i don’t see a reason why anyone should deny the jewish holocaust... my problem with holocaust denial however is the european cultural marxist/multiculturalist elite’s refusal to acknowledge the christian, hindu, buddhist, zoroastrian genocides by the hand of the islamic ummah... furthermore, while i oppose deniers of the jewish holocaust i realise that the “holocaust religion” is an extremely destructive force in europe... the “holocaust religion” has grown into a destructive anti-european monster, which prevents nationalistic doctrines from emerging... needless to say, while i am a strong supporter of israel and of all patriotic jews i acknowledge that the anti-european holocaust religion must be deconstructed, and instead replaced with an anti-islamic version... as of now, the “holocaust religion” is one of the major factors that are making europe vulnerable and susceptible for islamic conquest through demographical warfare... many ns support the islamic conspiracy theory that jews organised the 9/11 attacks and both reject that the holocaust took place (Holocaust. Breivik påstår at han har sett gjennom bevisene på begge sider og kommet til at holocaust er sann! Men den som søker sannheten og har god forstand og studerer holocaust kan bare komme til én konklusjon. Hva er i veien med Breivik? Han er programmert av jødene, det viser han i alt han står for, såvel som med sine handlinger 22/7. At holocaust-religionen er en ekstremt destruktiv kraft i Europa er selvfølgelig mye av hensikten. Likevel vil han ikke ta et oppgjør med den på den eneste måten det kan skje på, nemlig ved å gjendrive den. I takknemlighet for denne "ekstremt destruktive kraft" forkynner han sin sterke støtte til Israel og "patriotiske" jøder! Heller ikke om 9/11 har han skjønt noenting, til tross for at den offisielle versjon med arabiske flykaprere og terrorister er gjendrevet etter alle kunstens regler! Det er den jødeprogrammertes blinde punkt; han våger ikke og vil ikke og kan ikke se noenting ufordelaktig ved jøder eller Israel.)

were the majority of the german and european jews disloyal? yes, at least the so called liberal jews, similar to the liberal jews today that opposes nationalism/zionism and supports multiculturalism... jews that support multiculturalism today are as much of a threat to israel and zionism (israeli nationalism) as they are to us... so let us fight together with israel, with our zionist brothers against all anti-zionists, against all cultural marxists/multiculturalists... supports the deportation of all muslims from europe... pro-israel (pro-zionism/israeli nationalism, supports the deportation of muslims from the west bank and the gaza strip)... sensible people should support zionism (israeli nationalism) which is israel's right to self-defence against jihad (Ahh, de gode og dårlige jødene, sionist-jøder versus liberale jøder. Breivik har ikke skjønt at disse "gode" og "dårlige" jødene holder sammen og kjemper mot oss. Nesten alle jøder er både liberale, marxister og sionister. Hvor mange jøder vet du om som fordømmer Israel? Hvor mange jøder kjempet mot kommunismen i det tyvende århundre? Hvor mange motsetter seg typisk liberal politikk, for eksempel anti-rasisme og seksuell permissivitet? Ingen sionist støtter deportasjon av muslimer fra Europa. Breivik har ikke skjønt at jøder har doble standarder; de skiller alltid mellom jøder og ikke-jøder; de er for masseinnvandring og multikultur i Europa, og mot i Israel. De er ute etter å skade oss og intet samarbeid er mulig med dem. Staten Israel er som kjent sionistokkupert Palestina og ikke selvforsvar mot noenting.)

so basically, the ns ideology suggests that 950 jews are controlling the norwegian government, a government which is known to be the most anti-zionist of all european countries... many believe that we are race traitors for offering any non-muslim minority group the opportunity to fight with us and for flagging support to zionism (israeli nationalism) in our foundational principles... if the nsdap had been isolationistic instead of imperialistic(expansionist) and just deported the jews (to a liberated and muslim free zion) instead of massacring them, the anti-european hate ideology known as multiculturalism would have never been institutionalized in western europe, because the marxists would never have been so radicalized to begin with... most people are still terrified of nationalistic political doctrines thinking that if we ever embrace these principles again, new “hitler’s” will suddenly pop up and initiate global armageddon... after achieving total power in germany, hitler decided to conquer poland in 1939 and told his generals: "thus for the time being i have sent to the east only my 'death's head units' with the orders to kill without pity or mercy all men, women, and children of polish race or language... adolf hitler's autobiography mein kampf described a propaganda technique known as "the big lie"... adolf hitler described how to use “spiritual terror” to intimidate and silence opponents, a technique he learned from watching the socialists and the social democrats (Breivik har ikke lest en eneste NS-bok om jødefråga men innbiller seg likevel at han vet hvordan NS forklarer jødisk makt. Jødisk makt i Norge er selvfølgelig ikke betinget av antall bosatte jøder i Norge. Arbeiderpartiet har vært både marxistisk og sionistisk gjennom det meste av etterkrigstiden. Odd Karsten Tveit beskriver det slik i "Alt for Israel": "De ga alt for Israel, nordmennene som knyttet seg nært til den unge jødiske staten. De gikk i Mossads tjeneste, de leverte hemmelige militære informasjoner, de ga Israel hjelp til å utvikle atomvåpen. Men først og fremst ga de sin lojalitet til et Israel i krig med sine omgivelser – en krig mot palestinere fordrevet fra sine hjem, en krig preget av propaganda, løgner og fordekte hensikter. Norske offiserer, politikere, forretningsmenn og FN diplomater stilte seg villig til disposisjon. Blant de ivrigste var FNs generalsekretær Trygve Lie." Før sin avgang innrømmet Arbeidepartiets Håkon Lie alt dette, at deres prosjekt etter andre verdenskrig var «å bygge det nye Jerusalem», og angret seg og sa at de hadde gjort urett mot palestinerne ved sin ensidige støtte til Rothschilds egen stat å hvitvaske penger i. Når partiet til synes er blitt mindre sionistisk de senere år kan det jo bero på at det omtrent er umulig å få unge nordmenn til å like morderstaten Israel. Breiviks problem er at han er besatt av islamhat og ute av stand til å forholde seg til de politiske realiteter. Han støtter seg kun til falske kilder og har et vrengebilde av alle ting. NS var ikke imperialistisk og massakrerte ikke jøder. Når han tror at dette er årsaken til multikulturalismen tar han altså skammelig feil. Han synes blind for den demonisering som jødene har utsatt NS og Hitler for i etterkrigstiden og er selv hjernevasket av dem. Det er klart at alle som er det blir skremt av å sammenlignes med Hitler! Breivik er forstemmende ukritisk og godtroende i forhold til sine kilder og det forvrøvler hele hans argumentasjon. Når han f.eks. sier at Hitler sendte dødsskvadroner til Polen for å "drepe uten medlidenhet eller nåde alle... av polsk rase eller språk" så kan normale vel bevarte mennesker bare smile til slikt, men han svelger det rått. Når han sier at Hitler beskriver det ene og det andre synes han ikke å være bevisst at det er sine (Hitlers) motstanderes løgn og meningsterror han beskriver.)

adolf hitler says in hitler's table talk (august 28, 1942, midday): had charles martel not been victorious at poitiers -already, you see, the world had already fallen into the hands of the jews, so gutless a thing christianity! -then we should in all probability have been converted to mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh heaven to the bold warrior alone (Dette utsagnet finnes ikke i den tyske original og skyldes en svindeloversettelse til fransk ved François Genoud og oversettelse derfra videre til engelsk ved Hugh Trevor-Roper. Andre utsagn i dette etterlatte skrift om kristendom og islam, og Breivik tar opp noen til, er også forfalsket i oversettelsen. På dette falske grunnlag prøver han å få det til å se ut som om islam og NS var brødre i ånden. Eller de som programmerte ham gjør det. Agendaen er innlysende: Hat til den ene smitter over på den andre. Tyskland fikk støtte fra en rekke ikke-germanske folk rundt om i verden som led under anglojødisk imperialisme og sionisme. )

after all, the protocols and the dolchstosslegende, or "stab in the back myth" - the idea that germany didn't lose ww1 but was betrayed by socialists, intellectuals and jews - helped pave the way for adolf hitler and the nazis before ww2... it is a self defeating argument, if ever used in europe, as it automatically places you in the same category as hitler... this is an important distinction, in societies where leaders, lead to be served, we often see horrific abuses of power, such as with stalin, hitler, and saddam... hitler’s insane, genocidal and imperialistic doctrines have resulted in the post-war situation where nationalist doctrines altogether were branded as evil... hitler won votes and power by unfairly blaming the jews for germany's problems (At Tysklands vernemakt var ubeseiret ved første verdenskrigs slutt og at den ble dolket i ryggen av revolusjon på hjemmebane 9. november 1918 er et historisk faktum. Det er også velkjent at de revolusjonære var jøder og kommunister. Breiviks problem er hele tiden at han ikke har hatt adgang til pålitelig informasjon. Han er blitt gal av løgnen som gjennomsyrer ham. Han tar feil i nesten alt han sier og det skinner igjennom hvem som har ført ham på villspor: Hans blinde punkt er all ting jødisk. )

if there is one historical figure and past germanic leader i hate it is adolf hitler... why? no person has ever committed a more horrible crime against his tribe than hitler... hitler almost destroyed everything with his reckless and unforgivable actions and he will forever be known as a traitor to the nordic-germanic tribes... if you truly love our tribe, the nordic tribes or any other european tribe, you must learn and acknowledge that hitler is a traitor to the germanic and all european tribes, not a hero... hitler had the military capabilities necessary to liberate jerusalem and the nearby provinces from islamic occupation... the deportation of the jews from germany wouldn’t be popular but eventually, the jewish people would regard hitler as a hero because he returned the holy land to them... the only thing that separates hitler, stalin, pol pot with today’s cultural marxists, suicidal humanists, career cynicists and capitalist globalists (multiculturalists) is that the tyrants of today are all directly responsible for the extermination of their own people and intend to sell the rest into islamic slavery (Dette får stå som et monument over den galskap gjennomført løgn og desinformasjon kan drive en mann inn i. Han er hjernevasket av jøder og er blitt en kunstig jøde som kun er opptatt av jødiske anliggender slik som å "befri Jerusalem". Han reflekterer ikke over hvorfor en tysk fører skulle interessere seg for dette.)

one of its founders, george lukacs, stated its purpose as answering the question, “who shall save us from western civilisation?” the frankfurt school gained profound influence in european and american universities after many of its leading lights fled and spread all over europe and even to the united states in the 1930s to escape national socialism in germany... the members of the frankfurt school conducted numerous studies on the beliefs, attitudes and values they believed lay behind the rise of national socialism in germany... our religious heritage as well as the social basis of our society, the nuclear family, has been under constant attack... we demand that the ideology of multiculturalism should immediately be removed from all government policies and school curricula, and that the state should adopt a policy of supporting the continuation of the cultural heritage and traditions of the indigenous populations... as such, it is an evil ideology bent on an entire culture's eradication, and we, the peoples of europe, have not just a right, but a duty to resist it and an obligation to pass on our heritage to future generations... stop the ongoing european cultural and demographical genocide facilitated by the cultural marxists/multiculturalists, suicidal humanists, and capitalist globalist elites (Hvorfor er ikke Breivik i stand til å se at hvert eneste medlem av Frankfurt-skolen var jødisk? Hvorfor kan han ikke se hvem det er som utsetter oss for dette vedvarende angrep? Hvilken ond makt i Vesten er det som driver denne destruktive politikk? Hvem sitter med makten i Europa? Hvem står bak kulturmarxismen og selvmordshumanismen og hvem er den globale kapitalistelite? Han tillater seg ikke å tenke ut, følge sine tanker til deres logiske slutt. Så snart han nærmer seg tabu-området bøyer han av. Og så griper han til den vanlige syndebukken, islam. )

what the west needs to understand about islam is that islam has the potential of replacing the dangers that national socialism and communism brought with them... furthermore, the areas in which islam is growing most rapidly, such as western europe, have been largely denuded of their religious and cultural heritage, which leaves islam as the only vibrant ideology available to those in search of meaning... it's time to say, "enough," and teach our children to take pride in their own heritage... our schools are increasingly filled with courses disparaging our own indigenous cultural heritage while they praise islamic “tolerance... my advice to westerners in general is to arm themselves immediately, first of all mentally with knowledge of the enemy and pride in their own culture and heritage, but also physically with guns and the skills to use them (Islam eneste levende ideologi i Europa? Tåpelig. Ytterst få europeere føler seg tiltrukket av islam. Muslimske innvandrere gjør det selvfølgelig; de har denne religionen med seg i bagasjen. Det er sant nok at europeere har mistet sin religiøse og kulturelle arv, men den arv Breivik vil lære våre barn er jo jødisk! Han er en mann full av villfarelser bevæpnet med skytevåpen som er stolt av jødisk arv! )

prevent further islamic demographic warfare - disallow the muslim invasion/colonisation of europe... repulse islam from europe by the initiation of future deportation campaigns... effectuate punishment for western european cultural marxist/multiculturalist/globalist perpetrators for crimes committed against the indigenous peoples of europe... support israel’s fight against jihad... liberation of the middle east christians from islamic rule... virtues such as the willingness to martyr oneself for the cause, the exercise of discretion, voluntary poverty and devoted obedience to the principles are mandatory for all justiciar knights... honour the wishes and memories of our forefathers, who secured european security and prosperity in the past... after all, why shouldn’t we, scandinavians, nordics, germans and to a large degree brits, americans, polish, czechs, swiss, people from benelux and balticum be allowed to feel pride in our ethnic heritage and fight for our ethnic interests? shouldn’t we have the equal right to actively pursue and protect our interest based on ethnic origin when arabs, pashtuns, africans, kurds, tibetans, aboriginals, native americans, rom/gypsies are allowed to? why are we labeled as nazi monsters when we do and they are tolerated, encouraged and even supported financially? the answer has been explained in this compendium on multiple occasions (Hvorfor skal bare muslimsk fremmedinvasjon av Europa stanses og reverseres? Hva med resten? Er all fremmedinvasjon grei bare de invaderende lar seg døpe til kristen tro på flyet/båten/toget? Hvorfor skal vi støtte Israel? Hvordan gavner det oss europeere? Hva har det med vår etniske opprinnelse å gjøre? Hva angår det oss? Breivik burde ha prøvd å finne svar på hvorfor vi fordømmes som nazi-monstre når vi hevder vår sak; det har han nemlig aldri skjønt.)

after all, how are the cultural marxists going to create a one world utopia unless they deliberately annihilate, through gradual dilution, the european tribes? so why is tribalism and our ethnic heritage so important? despite what the marxists would like to believe, our genetical heritage is the most important cultural marker as it is a visual proof that you represent a certain culture, certain traditions, a certain identity... hail then, holy city, sanctified by the most high for his own tabernacle in order that such a generation might be saved in and through you! hail, city of the great king, source of so many joyous and unheard-of marvels! hail mistress of nations and queen of provinces, heritage of patriarchs, mother of apostles and prophets, source of the faith and glory of the christian people! if god has permitted you to be so often besieged, it has only been to furnish brave men an occasion for valor and immortality (Det han her sier om verdensutopien er riktig. Men han tar selvfølgelig feil når han sier at genetisk arv ikke er annet enn et kjennetegn på kulturell tilhørighet. Den biologiske arv avler kulturen! Men det er ikke Jerusalem den avler. Breivik er besatt av fremmed ånd og slett ingen talsmann for vår etniske egenart. )

first of all, as a norwegian, i am extremely proud of my odinistic/norse heritage as it is an essential aspect of my culture and my identity... supporting the christian cultural heritage does not automatically mean you hate odinism or vice versa... choosing to fight under the banner of the cross, does not constitute that you have to reject your odinistic heritage in any way or form... instead of abandoning the church we will save it and re-create it as a nationalistic church which will tolerate and allow (to a very large degree) native cultures/heritage/thought systems such as odinism... being a christian can mean many things; - that you believe in and want to protect europe’s christian cultural heritage... the european cultural heritage, our norms (moral codes and social structures included), our traditions and our modern political systems are based on christianity - protestantism, catholicism, orthodox christianity and the legacy of the european enlightenment (reason is the primary source and legitimacy for authority)... it is therefore essential to understand the difference between a “christian fundamentalist theocracy” (everything we do not want) and a secular european society based on our christian cultural heritage (what we do want)... i am very proud of my viking heritage (Han sier at kristendom kan bety mange ting, men vi ser jo av historien hva den betydde: den norrøne kulturarvs utslettelse! De som lot seg kristne måtte avsverge seg sin odinisme. Og de som ytte motstand ble torturert og myrdet. Hvorfor skal vi på død og liv holde fast ved en så intolerant, fanatisk og blodtørstig religion fra et fremmed land? Det tok oss århundre og kostet oss millioner av ofre å kjempe oss fri fra kirkens tyranni, og nå skal vi falle i dens armer igjen? Forsikringene om at det denne gang skal bli noe helt annet kan man bare smile bittert av. Breiviks egen galskap og fanatisme bærer bud om noe ganske annet! Våre institusjoner skal vi gjenoppbygge i pakt med vår egenart. )

so what is the difference between cultural christians and religious christians? if you have a personal relationship with jesus christ and god then you are a religious christian... myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship with jesus christ and god... there are no atheists in foxholes - preparing for martyrdom european christendom isn’t just about having a personal relationship with jesus or god... as long as you turn to jesus before death occurs, all will be forgiven… not only have the protestant views made a mockery of every christian historical codex, it has also severely undermined the practice and glorification of good deeds, martyrdom and sainthood... it is not required that you have a personal relationship with god or jesus in order to fight for our christian cultural heritage and the european way (Det eneste oppløftende ved kristendommen er jo Jesus selv, hans kjærlighet og ydmykhet, hans storsinn og sjelsadel, visdom og rettferdighet. Han er det som rørte menneskene i deres hjerter slik at kristendommen kunne erobre verden. Men Breivik har altså intet personlig forhold til ham! Han er en kristen som ikke bryr seg om Jesus. Men kristendom uten Jesus er nettopp frimurerdom, fariseerdom, jødedom. Det går ut på å gjenreise Salomos tempel, føde jødenes Messias, den nye verdenshersker. Breivik ville ha støttet det jødiske presteskap og krevd Barabbas løslatt, Jesus korsfestet. Kanskje ville han ha meldt seg frivillig for å piske Jesus på veien til Golgata, slik som hovedpersonen i "a Clockwork Orange". Faktum er at han og Arbeiderpartiet har hatt den samme agenda, å bygge det nye Jerusalem, som Håkon Lie uttrykte seg. Man bør derfor dobbelt mistenke at partiets ledelse var innblandet i terroren mot egne ungdommer for å tukte dem til å oppgi fiendskapet til Israel. Det er blitt veldig stille blant dem om Israel etter 22/7. Jeg tror alle har oppfattet budskapet. Vi germanske protestanter legger ingen vekt på ytre gjerninger, men all vekt på sinnelaget hvormed de begås. Alle mennesker kan gjøre gode gjerninger av forfengelighet og i håp om belønning på Jorden og frelse i Himmelen; det er ingen fortjeneste i det. Bare den som handler av rent hjerte uten baktanker er Gud velbehagelig. )

but his sixth, “aesthetic theory and the critique of mass culture,” provides an answer to the question of why most “serious” modern art and music is so awful... theodor adorno was the institute’s lead figure on high culture - he began life as a music critic and promoter of schönberg - and his view was that in the face of the “repressiveness” of bourgeois society, art could only be “true” if it were alienating, reflecting the alienated society around it... when lifelong torontonians are hot for decapitation, when yorkshiremen born and bred and into fish ‘n’ chips and cricket and lousy english pop music self-detonate on the london tube, it would seem that the phenomenon of “re-primitivised man” has been successfully exported around the planet... she also believes that although the most radical break with the past took place during the 60s and 70s, the roots of western youth culture are to be found in the 1950s with the birth of rock and roll music, elvis presley and actors such as james dean (Intet galt i dette. Samstemmer.)

but rap took a dark turn in the early 1980s, as this “bubble gum” music gave way to a “gangsta” style that picked up where blaxploitation left off... music critics fell over themselves to praise “the message,” treating it as the poetry of the streets-as the elite media has characterised hip-hop ever since... rap’s musical accompaniment mirrors the brutality of rap lyrics in its harshness and repetition... what we used for melody was implied melody, and what we used for music was sounds-beats, scratches, stuff played backward, nothing pretty or sweet... but in the eighties, rock quieted down, and black music became the assault on the ears and soul... hip-hop exploded into popular consciousness at the same time as the music video, and rappers were soon all over mtv, reinforcing in images the ugly world portrayed in rap lyrics... nor do we discover music of such violence in places of great misery like ethiopia or the congo-unless it’s imported american hip-hop... with music videos, dvd players, walkmans, the internet, clothes, and magazines all making hip-hop an accompaniment to a person’s entire existence, we need to take it more seriously (Bra. Nå har han nevnt både Frankfurter-skolen og MTV som bakmenn for denne kulturnedbrytning, men vil likevel ikke identifisere ugjerningsmennene. )

the right to maintain, cherish, protect and display our own indigenous cultural expressions such as music, artwork and sculptures... how to sustain your high morale and motivation for years through music becoming and maintaining the position as a self sufficient justiciar knight sleeper cell involves the capability to motivate/indoctrinate yourself over a prolonged period of time... for me, the most common ritual is taking a long walk listening to my favourite music on my ipod (Bifaller. Musikk er utrolig viktig. Ingen blir en stor mann uten å være musikalsk. Hitler var meget musikalsk og en kunstner; hans taler var dramaer. )

cultural marxists are antagonistic to genetic explanations of human abilities or behaviour because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others... why do europeans lack cultural and political self confidence to prevent its own suicide? is it genetical and a way nature is saying that europeans are not “fit to exist” or is it just due to decades of excessive decadence? ... the greatly expanded childless segment of contemporary society, whose members are drawn disproportionately from the feminist and countercultural movements of the 1960s and 70s, will leave no genetic legacy... dominant genes blue eyes and blond hair (and possibly many psychological traits) almost never survives a race-mixing process due to the fact that nordic genotypes are recessive unlike f example african, arab or oriental genotypes which are considerably more genetically dominant... so why not offer our children the actual genetical gift instead, through repro-genetics, rather than spending thousands of euro and thousands of hours on make-up trying to mimic the nordic ideal? as the nordic ideal obviously is still prevalent in this multiculturalist world it may not be too late to prevent the extinction of the nordic tribes... solutions to prevent the extinction of the nordic tribes and for implementation of conservative principles the key to our survival is to liberalise the strict bio-technology laws and to commercialise and glorify repro-genetics while there is still a sustainable selection of nordics of 99% purity left (this window of opportunity will be forever lost within 150 years)... repro-genetics offer everything europe could ever dream of with very few drawbacks... so naturally, a nordic tribe would be much more motivated to protect its uniqueness because nordic genetical characteristics are manifested physically in a much greater degree... no nordic country should ever try to absorb more than 2% of non-european immigrants per generation providing that they can mend the non-nordic dilution by compensating with reprogenetics clinics which can reverse national/tribal dilution... unfortunately, the horrors of ww2 created a stigma associated with all future research and advances in the field of reprogenetics and improving humans biologically by removing negative hereditary factors... the end result, according to silver, is that those parents who can afford it will be able to pick out the genetic characteristics of their own children, which silver says will trigger a number of social changes in the decades after its implementation (Mer om dette med eugenikk og reprogenetikk som jeg allerede har kommentert. Breivik er oppslukt av teknologi og har kanskje lest for mye science fiction. Han skal gjøre alle ting på en kunstig teknologisk måte i steden for å følge naturen - det er betenkelig. Det minner om bolsjevisme. En eneste gal reprogenetiker med vidtgående fullmakter i hans diktaturstat kan ødelegge hva det har tatt naturen milliarder av år å bygge opp. Jeg ønsker ikke å se mennesket gjenskapt i reagensglasset. )

we know that the cultural marxist elites in western europe have created an adoption system which facilitates the adoption of asians and africans but makes the adoption of european babies more or less impossible... not only are absolutely all european countries significantly influenced by marxism (matriarchy leads to low birth rates, while asia and africa still has patriarchy leading to high birth rates) but it would seem like there is a deliberate agenda of attempting to genetically dilute our tribe by systematical facilitation of adoption from asia and africa... just as the planet is in the midst of an unprecedented population boom, and technological advances have combined to produce the largest and fastest migration waves in the history of mankind, many democratic nations have become so bogged down by idealistic human rights legislation and naive open border ideologies that they have now lost control over their own borders... we must spend the next 20 years wisely and continue our work on creating a pan european conservative consolidation, a new conservative political ideology (a political ideal) which has the potential to appeal to a minimum of 20-35% of western europeans, including the bulk of our youth... cultural marxist/multiculturalist ideals are far more compelling (emotionalism, multiculturalism, humanism which has led us towards the ongoing islamisation of europe), however they are suicidal to any civilisation and cannot be accepted or tolerated... they often recruit under false and deceptive idealistic banners we all have sympathy for (anti-racist, pro-minority, pro-gay, anti-war, pro-environment, pro-wildlife, helping palestinian children and similar organisations) (Ja, uten tvil er det bevisst politikk å presse nordiske mennesker til å adoptere fra den tredje verden. Forekommer det i det hele tatt at nordmenn adopterer hvite barn? Regimet benytter alle virkemidler det kan komme på for å utrydde oss. Menneskerettigheter er den åndelige gift som lammer vår motstand mot denne politikk. Den er ikke idealistisk men den utnytter vår idealisme og naivitet. )

. the problem here however is that cultural conservatives (and most anti-marxists) generally lack an idealistic and voluntary mindset... they didn’t care about politics as they generally lacked an idealistic mindset and were instead busy working, providing for their families... we are egotistical and greedy zealots driven by our lust for personal acquisitions/prestige completely lacking a political idealistic drive... i doubt we can ever fully match the idealistic spirit of the marxist as it is not in our nature (Breivik kommer fra det velstående borgerlige Oslo vest. Der finnes det ingen som har interesse for idealistisk politisk innsats hvor man må ofre noe. De stemmer Høyre i håp om skattelettelse og det er det.)

what role does, or should, christianity play in western civilisation? is it the bedrock of our culture[2], as robert spencer of jihad watch thinks, and is our decline associated with abandoning it? or is christianity, as john derbyshire puts it[3], a religion for once and future slaves, an ideology that is now fueling globalist ideals and undermining our borders through mass immigration? the christian-non-christian divide is perhaps the most difficult divide to overcome within the west today (De kristne har vel ingen makt til å påvirke noen i dag men blir selv påvirket og kristendommen brukt som redskap av dem som setter den politiske dagsorden. Derfor er kristne menigheter politisk korrekte i likhet med alle andre institusjoner. De er anti-rasistiske, pro-homofile, pro-feministiske osv.)

. our legal system, at least in europe, is moving away from the ideal of laws passed with the consent of the people and with their best interest in mind into transnational legislation written by faceless technocrats, with no loyalty to any specific people... the reason is that the people will not rise and fight for their ideals as long as we live in economical prosperity... they deliberately portray us as the anti-thesis of the ideal person so that we achieve a minimum of impact when it comes to appealing to the average european... so in a world where cash is king, how can we expect anyone to champion the correct ideals and truth? i’ve discussed this so many times with my sister and so many others... the political right simply lacks a fundamental idealistic mindset to a much larger degree than the political left (Desverre er det mye sant i dette. Plutokratiet dreper idealisme. Folk er vant til egoisme og materialisme og gjør aldri noe for andre. Så lenge de nyter velstand gir de blaffen i politikk. Idealister trekkes til venstresiden fordi det ikke finnes idealisme på høyresiden. Men folk på venstresiden er også mer opptatt av politikk fordi de lever i små kår og er bedre motivert. Det er også mer fellesskap og samhold blant småkårsfolk enn blant borgere, som er mer individualistiske. )

. i have obviously changed my ways over the years and am now driven by idealistic goals and work for the interests of my countrymen and all europeans... christine told me that she believed i was driven by idealism, which is of course true, but that i actually lived my dream... he ignores the path of decadence and instead chooses the difficult path of sacrifice because serving his people and the sovereignty of his country is more important to him than a life of self-centeredness... i think not of glory and seek to be formidable rather than decadent (Hadde du bare ikke vært så villfaren så kanskje dine krefter hadde kunnet komme til nytte også. )

ok, back on topic; what on earth are the nordic/germanic tribes and why are we disallowed to preserve especially the nordic/germanic tribes today? in order to understand the evil and suicidal european marxism of today you must first learn about national socialism: nordicism (also referred to as the"nordic theory") is the ideology of racial superiority which claims that the nordic race (the germanic peoples/tribes), would constitute a master race because of an innate capacity for initiative, long term planning and leadership... multiculturalism is a reactionary ideology to nordicism which in many ways aims to completely wipe out the germanic tribes and other european tribes as europeans are defined, according to hardcore internationalist marxists, as a cancer to this world as it is claimed that our ancestors where evil... as covered in another chapter; within approximately 100-150 years or within 4-5 generations (if the current development is allowed to continue) the germanic/nordic race in several countries will be diluted or annihilated to such a degree that there will be no one left with nordic physical characteristics; blond hair, blue eyes, high forehead, sturdy cheekbones... multiculturalism must be destroyed as soon as possible, or we, all european tribes, will seize to exist within 100 years! you are not alone - 14 david’s against one goliath i am extremely proud of my ethnic group, norwegians which is a northern-germanic tribe (Alt dette er riktig, bortsett fra at nordisisme ikke var standard NS men spøkte i bakgrunnen. )

the west isn’t feared because we are “oppressors,” we are despised because we are perceived as being decadent and weak... in addition to just plain decadence, there is a widespread ideological feeling in europe that nothing is worth fighting for, certainly not through armed struggle... but it could also, theoretically, have the opposite effect, where the shock waves could create a different kind of europe from the decadent, nihilistic europe we see now... the coming decade will witness the war between the values of islam and the secular “values” of the decadent, hedonistic post-marxist left... our traditional rather cynical and spartan values, which resulted in that europe became the cradle of civilisation, have been allowed to develop into excessive decadence... multiculturalism and uncontrolled mass-immigration destroy the internal cohesion of the decadent west, which will slowly fall apart as it has lost the will to defend itself and the belief in its own culture... if history is any guide, today’s decadent, bored, post-religious and post-nationalist europe will be no match for islam, unless it rediscovers a belief in its own culture and a will to defend it... luckily more and more europeans are realising the truth but many still asks themselves; who is to blame for this?... why do europeans lack cultural and political self confidence to prevent its own suicide? is it genetical and a way nature is saying that europeans are not “fit to exist” or is it just due to decades of excessive decadence? (Viktige og riktige tanker. Alle vet at Europa er dekadent, at vi har mistet religion, moral og kultur; at vi er blitt et kontinent av sveklinger og likegyldige mennesker. )

. how can they claim to be today’s manifestation of a pious chivalric order when the core doctrine of the knights templar was to submit to voluntary poverty? all i see is a group of decadent individuals who are not willing to make any substantial sacrifices for anyone or anything... such a hypocritical and weak attitude just encourages millions of blacks, orientals and asians to become parasites who dine at the abundant table of the west for free... because islam prohibits the practice of usury to muslims, christians exercised a certain monopoly on the trades of goldsmith, jeweller, and moneylender... the great difference in fertility rates between secular individualists and religious or cultural conservatives augurs a vast, demographically driven change in modern societies... in addition to the greater fertility of conservative segments of society, the rollback of the welfare state forced by population aging and decline will give these elements an additional survival advantage (Pengelån var først og fremst jødenes gebet fordi også kirken forbød kristne åger. De som satser på utdannelse og karriære dør ut, de som formerer seg og blir mange arver Jorden.)

so the question becomes: do we make demands on individuals and possibly restrict individual liberty to encourage breeding, introduce new forms of incentives or do we invest billions in developing artificial wombs and contract the parenting out to a new population industry? perhaps we should go back to third world conditions and values to increase fertility rates? the main problem is the working women... so they work, and reason that they can have kids at a later age, not realising that the statistics for fertility after the age of 30 look dire at best... only later did she realise that he “also meant the cultural war, the demographic war, the religious war waged by stealing a country from its citizens - in short, the war waged through immigration, fertility, presumed pluriculturalism... from 33 million to 172 million in only 60 years! this is the population explosion you end up with if you allow an immigrant birth rate (fertility rate) of only 3,58 which was the 2008 estimate in pakistan[1]... aiding and abetting to cause the extinction of the indigenous europeans’ by creating and/or maintaining the marxist social structures which has lead to an average fertility rate of less than 1,5 among the indigenous europeans... the political and cultural elites are deliberately selling their own people into islamic slavery by allowing islamic demographical warfare and by their reluctance to ensure a national indigenous fertility rate of 2,1 ... without a fundamental change in our social structures we will be unable to meet the minimum requirement for a sustainable fertility rate: 2,1 ... indeed, falling fertility is a recurring tendency of human civilization... what they have in common are customs and attitudes that collectively serve to maximize fertility and parental investment in the next generation... isolated, “sex and the city lifestyle” is relatively harmless, but if you glorify it and ram it down the throat of mainstream society like we see today it becomes a lethal and destructive societal force as we are witnessing which eventually leads to a complete breakdown of moral/ethics, the nuclear family model and a sustainable fertility rate which again is leading us to the extinction of europeans... her chlamydia went untreated and she became one of several million us/european women who were suffering from pid, pelvic inflammatory disease caused by untreated gonorrhea and chlamydia which leads to infertility (Ja, alt dette er sant og burde utbasuneres med megafon på torvet i byen hver dag. Det kreves drastiske politiske virkemidler for å avverge den demografiske katastrofe og hindre at vi dør ut og den nordiske rase forsvinner fra Jorden. Det er ikke mulig å ordne dette gjennom demokratiske kanaler; vi trenger å avskaffe demokratiet og innføre et nytt autoritært styre som vi hadde i gamledager. Demokratiet har vist seg totalt udugelig til å røkte folkevelet; det må erstattes av et stabilt styre av menn som har vilje og makt til å gjøre det som må gjøres. Men hvordan skal vi vinne forståelse for dette når de som forespråker det er terrorister, Breivik? Og det er ikke bare marxisme som ligger bak lav fruktbarhet: Fruktbarheten i DDR var lav men den gikk enda mer ned etter kommunismens fall, og den i BRD er også meget lav. Årsaken ligger snarere i noe som det kommunistiske øst og kapitalistiske vest har felles. )

the reasoning for this theory is that the nordic peoples has been forced to, due to the cold arctic climate, to logistically plan ahead for up to 6 months per year to be able to survive the cold winters... multiculturalism is a reactionary ideology to nordicism which in many ways aims to completely wipe out the germanic tribes and other european tribes as europeans are defined, according to hardcore internationalist marxists, as a cancer to this world as it is claimed that our ancestors were evil... madison grant, in his book the passing of the great race, defined the "nordic" type as "long skulled, very tall, fair skinned, with blond hair and light colored eyes... as such, the nordic tribes will become extinct if we do not resist and seize political and military control of our countries... to illustrate the ongoing demographic annihilation of the nordic peoples; in 1900 there were 50% nordics in the us (blonde hair, blue eyes)... instead of overly focusing on formulating arguments based on the superiority and intelligence of europeans you should primarily focus on indigenous european rights; that the nordic tribes and the rest of the european tribes are on its stabile course towards extinction because of multiculturalisms facilitation of islamic demographic warfare... what will the government do to prevent the ongoing islamic demographical warfare against european? what will they do to prevent the nordic ethnic group in given country from going extinct? how do they justify the ongoing demographical annihilation of the europeans? why do they continue to allow mass-muslim immigration in combination with marxist procreation policies (feminism resulting in a low birth rate) when they know that these policies will result in our extinction? why are they so arrogant that they claim that the only solution to our problems, the cultural conservative world view, is an evil nazi ideology while the cause of all our problems, their cultural marxist world view, is the only truth? why are the native americans granted reservations (completely reserved for their ethnic group) while indigenous europeans aren’t awarded the same basic human rights? why are the indigenous native american tribes treated with more dignity and respect than indigenous european tribes? these are all good questions we should focus on in the decades to come... you will easily lose the discussion if you talk about islamisation and you suddenly start to discuss the nordic genotypes... i don’t see why we shouldn’t actively strive for the establishment of a nordic league propagating nordic interests, following the design of the arab league... so, back to the initial question; what type of rhetorical approach should you use when openly arguing against the demographical annihilation of the nordic ethnic groups or any other european ethnic groups? marxist demonisation techniques and psychological warfare sadly, you will be indirectly or directly labeled as a racist or even as a nazi monster by the marxist establishment (government institutions and the msm - multiculturalist media) if you attempt to openly argue for the immediate halt to the ongoing demographical genocide of the nordic peoples... in 1950, we were more or less a pure nordic country but we now have an additional 850 000 non-nordics present with 30 000- 50 000 non-nordics pouring in annually... in any case, we need to get over this taboo as soon as possible because it is estimated that the nordic genotypes will be extinct completely within 200 years... this is mainly due to intermarriage between nordics and non-nordics... the nordic genotypes might be wiped out within 200 years and yet not a single counter-measure has been employed to prevent this from happening due to the fact that it is considered politically incorrect... segregating nordics and non-nordic genotypes at this point would be almost impossible even if you had military and political carte blanche... even in norway and sweden the number of individuals with the nordic genotype is reduced annually at a drastic rate due to eu open borders program, mass-asian/african immigration and significantly higher asian/african (especially muslim) birthrates (Ja, vi er stort sett enige om fakta her. Nøkkelspørsmålet er: Hvilken retorisk tilnærmelse for å hevde de nordiske geners sak? Hvordan styre unna demonisering som nazi-monster? Kjensgjerningen er den at nasjonalsosialistene ble demonisert fordi de førte en rasebevisst politikk. Enhver bevegelse i vår tid som prøver det samme vil bli demonisert på samme måte. Det hadde hjulpet godt om Breivik hadde skjønt hvem som står bak demoniseringen. Men det finnes intet alternativ til å snakke åpent om vår nordiske sak. Man må bare gjøre det på en fordragelig måte og tydeliggjøre at man er et fromt og ansvarlig menneske, ikke drevet av hat. )

Rønnaug